User talk:Omegium

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia![edit]

Hello Omegium, welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for all your contributions. Here are some useful links in case you haven't already found them:

If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

—Noldoaran (Talk) 00:44, Feb 25, 2004 (UTC)


Hi Omegium,

Thanks for reverting that mess on the article bicycle. I dont know how that happened. It seems that spamers used my wikipedia account to put those commercial links. How else could it happen? I never put those links. trust me. But this is hurting and scary because I have been abused by spamers. Is there a solution for this mess. Robin klein 04:34, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)

I checked the history of the files that I edited on 19th of december 2004 and realised that spammers have used my account to add commercial links to several of the edits that I made. How is this possible. These articles were: Babel, Terry Fox, Payroll,Etruscan civilization, shark

thanks Robin klein 05:06, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Quarto by email[edit]

Hi Omegium, a new mailing list has been set up to distribute news about the Wikimedia foundation, specifically at the moment to publicise Quarto. I saw your name on the quarto talk page requesting a copy by email, and I think this mailing list is how we're going to do it for the moment. It'll be a html email, which I've added to the Quarto talk page m:Talk:WQ. Mailing list is called Foundation-news-l (We also need translators!) Cheers w:User:Cormaggio

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

"GP's #3 hull" etc.[edit]

   I'm writing to apologize on behalf of the native-English-speaker contingent, or at least the Niven fans within it, for it having taken so long for anyone to fix the grammar in references to e.g. the General Products #3 hull. It should have looked wrong to some native speaker who cared enuf to fix it, before 11 years had passed (even tho many Americans -- at least -- are hazy about e.g. the distinction between singular vs. plural possessives, and especially the logically inconsistent rules for possessive pronouns vs. nouns)!
   The preceding 'graph is only the first 1/3 of what i've so far (bis jetzt, i think) written. And i now realize i should not write more unless you would like me to attempt to explain, or better yet, answer specific questions, especially about the logic. Thanks for contributing, especially in a "2nd language". And "give my regards to" THE (which i would not confuse, for more than 10 seconds per occasion, with ETH).
--Jerzyt 14:05, 25 December 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nomination of Magical objects in Harry Potter for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Magical objects in Harry Potter is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magical objects in Harry Potter until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. El cid, el campeador (talk) 16:44, 14 June 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]